Mark Lemley said he could not “in good conscience” represent Mark Zuckerberg given recent decisions to "encourage disinformation and hate speech" on his company's platforms. A suit pending in Northern California alleges Meta infringed the copyrights of several authors by using their works to train its generative AI program.

A lawyer representing Meta in an intellectual property lawsuit said he has dropped the tech giant as a client over Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to scrap fact-checking on his social media platforms. Mark Lemley,

Lawyer Mark Lemley said he's firing Meta as a client over Mark Zuckerberg's "descent into toxic masculinity and Neo-Nazi madness"

Stanford law professor Mark Lemley represented Meta in a 2023 copyright case in which the company used a data set containing copyrighted e-books to train its

Mark Lemley, a lawyer and Stanford lecturer announced that he is no longer representing Meta because of the company's and CEO Mark Zuckerberg's "descent into toxic masculinity and Neo-Nazi madness." Lemley had represented Meta in an intellectual property lawsuit.

Mark Lemley, a lawyer representing Meta in an intellectual property lawsuit said that he has dropped Meta as a client over Mark Zuckerberg's decision to scrap fact-checking on his social media platforms.